Jables Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Meh. That's just called a killing spree. No one called the Manson family white-hunting racists. But they were racially motivated. I can't believe I have to wait until Jan 24 for this! It even has John Jarrat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hakujin Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Hurry up, Jax! There's still time to order for Christmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panch Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 This is more my speed: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The NZA Posted December 22, 2012 Author Share Posted December 22, 2012 is that just a comic adaptation of the movie, though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panch Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Yeah so? Aren't those figures just toy adaptations of the characters? And to think I almost got you that comic as a Christmas present this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The NZA Posted December 22, 2012 Author Share Posted December 22, 2012 i mean, i'm not trying to knock it, i just thought we'd agreed in the past that usually they put whoever on the art, and you can't really read it till the movie drops cause of spoilers is all. i was kinda hoping it was a prequel or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reverend Jax Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 (edited) Hurry up, Jax! There's still time to order for Christmas. Maybe things have changed in the 9 hours since you posted this, but Amazon is out of Djangos, Broomhildas and Butches. They have 4 Candies, 2 Schultz and 8 Stephens. They are also out of complete set, for which you could have saved negative 5 cents for the privilege of purchasing them together. The last two minutes of this interview have erupting into a bit of controversy, as would be expected, jump to 9:15 if you want to see just that. Edited December 22, 2012 by Reverend Jax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reverend Jax Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Some retro style, fan-made Django Unchained posters. The first one is my favorite, but it listed JGL in the movie, and this was before he had to drop out of the cast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keth Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Christoph Fucking Waltz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrizzle Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Indeed. He's definitely one of my favorite people. After this movie, I felt like I needed to seriously remind myself that it isn't socially acceptable to casually use the word "nigger" in polite company. SO MUCH NIGGER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keth Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Just about, almost every time they uttered the word nigger, there was a mass of giggling, even during serious moments. I know... Texas, but still it was kind of awkward how often people laughed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrizzle Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 How could they do that? It would have been 3 solid hours of giggling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The NZA Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 you can't not laugh the way old man sam jackson says it though we had one gal with a baby in there at 2am...one scene in particular (Waltz flashes back to it) stood out as being really not ideal viewing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reverend Jax Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 The movie was great. Not sure where it belongs in the pantheon of Tarantino films, but I know I like Inglourious Basterds more after 3 years than I did when I first saw it (and I loved it when I first saw it). Hats off to Samuel L Jackson for his willingness to play, in his words, "the most despised negro in cinematic history." Leonardo DiCaprio also, at least for me, disappeared into his role. I was legitimately sad when King Schultz died, and when Django went back to say 'Auf wiedersehen.' I know I shouldn't go into any Tarantino movie expecting any characters to survive til the end, just as a matter of precaution, but I didn't expect him to go when he did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The NZA Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 true, but i couldn't help but figure sam had some fun with that role, personification of uncle ruckus that it was. despicable, but at least enjoyably so - put it this way, id wager he enjoyed this role more than he did shaft, heh. and to your spoiler: yeah, all of us were on the same page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lycaon Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I do love his attitude just before he died, though. Just couldn't help himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Lindsay Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 i feel like tarantino is the only person who knows how to use waltz properly in a movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hakujin Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Fox may play the titular character, but Waltz and DiCaprio totally stole this movie. I don't think it was mentioned in here, but the scene w/ Candie's bloody hand was DiCaprio doing some major method acting... That was blood from a real cut that he improved smearing all over Hildy's face. As the scene plays out, Candie slams his hand on a dining room table. It was during one take of that scene when DiCaprio unintentionally slammed his hand into glass, creating a gash that later required medical care. But that didn't stop him from doing his job. As his hand bled quite visibly, DiCaprio kept going, even using the hand as a new dramatic prop. At one point he smears his bloodied hand over Broomhilda's face in an act of evil dominance. And Broomhilda (Washington) looks horrified as he does it. (Perhaps Washington wasn't acting!) And that was the take that director Quentin Tarantino kept in the film. "Leo had slammed his hand on the table countless times and he moved his hand further and he crushed a crystal cordial glass," "Django" producer Stacey Sher also recently told Variety. "Blood was dripping down his hand. He never broke character. He kept going. He was in such a zone. It was very intense. He required stitches." I'm calling it now. Best and most fun movie of the year. Sorry Avengers, there is no way I will enjoy Django less. I enjoyed the film as well, but you can't seriously still be sticking to this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrizzle Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 You seriously aren't? Django > Avengers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the division of joy Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 I've seen neither and I can say for certain that Django > Avengers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reverend Jax Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 (edited) Yeah, I'm sticking to it Haku, and I think I'll be in good company. Like I said, it's not just a better movie than Avengers, it's not just a more important movie than Avengers, it was a more fun movie than Avengers. I'm trying to think of a movie I've seen that I thought was more fun than this, since I saw Inglourious Basterds, and I think Scott Pilgrim may be the only one. Even Toy Story 3, which I think it a better film than those three (Django, Pilgrim and Basterds), was not as fun. I still think Avengers was a lot of fun (it's my second most fun film of the year), but Django was better. I've seen neither and I can say for certain that Django > Avengers. You haven't seen Avengers? Purposefully avoiding, or have you somehow just not gotten around to catching it? i feel like tarantino is the only person who knows how to use waltz properly in a movie. I haven't seen any of the movies Waltz has been in other than his two Tarantino films. Were any of them any good, even if they didn't properly use Waltz? Edited December 29, 2012 by Reverend Jax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the division of joy Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Not seen it, no real want to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iambaytor Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 I haven't seen any of the movies Waltz has been in other than his two Tarantino films. Were any of them any good, even if they didn't properly use Waltz? The only two I know of are Green Hornet (where he had a pretty memorable role considering he wasn't in much of it) and that one movie John C. Reilly where they and two actresses I can't recall (I wanna say Kate Winslet and Jodie Foster) played the parents of some kids who had been in a fight at school and Waltz played an aloof jackass who spent most of the movie on the phone. That movie didn't use anybody well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keth Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 He was also in that water for elephants. Did not see it though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the division of joy Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 He was great in Ordinary Decent Criminal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.