Jump to content
Hondo's Bar

Thor: The Dark World


Keth
 Share

Recommended Posts

set photos

 

YdmM4.jpg

 

DHiSE.jpg

s99Fw.jpg

s1HC6.jpg

LmNST.jpg

Directed by Alan Taylor, the sequel is now filming for a November 8, 2013 release. Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Jaimie Alexander, Idris Elba, Zachary Levi, Stellan Skarsgard, Christopher Eccleston, Kat Dennings and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje star.

 

 

Also Mr. Eko plays a villain

FpWkx.jpg

Variety is reporting that actor Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje will be taking on two villain roles, sort of, for the upcoming Marvel Studios film Thor: The Dark World. He will be portraying Algrim the Strong and Kurse.

 

Algrim first appeared in Thor #347 and was one of the most powerful of the dark elves. He is given the task of killing Thor by Malekith the Accursed (set to be played by Christopher Eccleston). He is betrayed by Malekith who tries to kill Thor by allowing both the god of thunder and Algrim to fall to their deaths. While both survived, Algrim developed amnesia from the event and is transformed into the much more powerful being Kurse.

 

Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje has appeared on screen in G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, The Bourne Identity, and played Mr. Eko on "Lost."

 

The release date is kinda weird, but I guess they are going for holiday movie season money.

 

 

 

 

 

damn tags

Edited by axel_napalm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 months later...

So this comes out in November, and Iron Man 3 is coming out in May. Anyone should be able to figure out that they would have at least a teaser for this movie before Iron Man 3 (and by the way, Cap 2 comes out in April 2014, so you can bet on a teaser for that before Thor 2). Well, the Thor 2 teaser will debut exclusively online on April 23 before appearing in theaters in from of Iron Man 3.

 

By the way, numbered sequels are good enough for Iron Man, but Thor and Captain America just get subtitles. The official name of the Avengers sequel has not been announced. Anyone had a prediction as to whether it'll be The Avengers 2, or if it'll just have a subtitle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think so two, but why not just go with Thor 2 and Cap 2? Do you think maybe they feel there's a lot of people that just got on this marvel train with the Avengers and might not even be aware of the previous movies, so putting 2's at the end would only discourage them from going to see a Thor or Cap movie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The non numerical titles didn't hurt Nolan's Batrilogy a lick. Not sure why Marvel's doing it has got your panties in a wad, Jax.

It didn't hurt the original Star Wars trilogy either. But the Marvel Cinematic Universe is a metafranchise, with several franchises within it, and there is no consistency among the subfranchises, so I'm just wondering if there's a reason why Iron Man got numbered and Thor and Cap didn't? It's purely curiosity.

 

Was it because Marvel was disappointed with their inaugural titles' box office numbers, or critical reception? Because while neither was as good as Iron Man's neither was not shabby. If Avengers gets a non-numbered sequel, I think that's give a lot of credibility to the argument that after the wanted to keep Iron Man's titles consistent, but since Iron Man 2 have changed their sequel titling strategy. If they go with Avengers 2, it lends credibility to the argument that movies whose performances they were happy with get numbers, and movies whose performance merited a sequel, but feel short for them, get subtitles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jax's theory makes a lot of sense. Less people saw Thor and Captain America than Iron Man, and I'm sure some research somewhere probably suggests that people who were uninterested in the first movie of a series are less likely to see the sequel.

For many of the folks who saw the Avengers, that was their first exposure to Captain America and Thor, but not so much Iron Man. I can see a scenario where someone was like "Captain America 2 looks cool, but I need to see the first one first". Maybe that'll happen less with a subtitle? It certainly wouldn't happen more.

 

TL;DR - Yeah, I think there's some nefarious marketing going on here. It doesn't bother me, but I think it's very interesting to take note of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interest in this, pre-trailer, is pretty low. More indifferent than excited.

 

So I decided to look up the director, this Alan Taylor character, to see what effect that would have.

 

Turns out this is practically the big screen debut of a TV director. Interest waning.

 

But he's directed some really fucking good TV.

 

 

Game of Thrones (TV series) 2011-2012

 

Boardwalk Empire (TV series) 2010

 

Bored to Death (TV series) 2009-2010

 

Nurse Jackie (TV series) 2010

 

Mad Men (TV series) 2007-2008

 

The Sopranos (TV series) 1999-2007

 

Big Love (TV series) 2006

 

Rome (TV series) 2005

 

Deadwood (TV series) 2004-2005

 

Carnivàle (TV series) 2005

 

Six Feet Under (TV series) 2002

 

The West Wing (TV series) 1999-2000

 

Oz (TV series) 1997-1998

 

Interest near current level cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...