The NZA Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 source The actor/actress must have performed in at least 10 films (writing, directing, and producing credits were omitted). At least one of these films had to have grossed $30 million or more at the box office, adjusted for inflation. At least one of these films had to be within the past 5 years (we only wanted semi-active performers) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donatella Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 This is an interesting way of calculating this. It's not critiquing their performances, per se, but rather the reviews of their films as a whole. I wonder how much of this falls on the writers/directors, though. Like, would Salma Hayek or Cameron Diaz be in a better position if they were offered better roles in better films? Hmm. The best actor/actress lists are on point, though. Lots of talent there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dag Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 I love that Nathan Raban quote. I almost spit out my coffee while reading it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.