SpunkyMonkey

Now this guy's got issues.

Oh nice Nick, now you're editing people's posts...

what's next, banning???

:-D, come on now, this is getting good.

It, does. I never knew that? "perhaps" i should-ve looked into it more: yes!

Hey, let's not get too crazy, here.

Oh relax, he's at least still capitalizing proper nouns.

no, it was just me not giving a fuck about the word was at that juncture in time

So you misspelled it on purpose? how renegade of you! Take that OXFORD UNIVERSITY

well it ws nice of you to clarify

Thanks... also, you misspelled "was", it has an "a" in the middle. Unless you mean the airline WestJet, of Canada, IATA 2-letter code WS.

First off, lemme apologize for totally misunderstanding the rules of blargh.

 

For some reason I got it into my head that consecutive posts weren't allowed.

 

Next, lemme say that the posts where I basically pointed out Spunky and others consecutive posts were borderline in so far as the blargh rule in direct reply. It wasn't quite a direct reply, but it was more than just a random comment.

 

I'd be quite ok if those two posts I made got crapshacked or moved to blargh-reply.

 

-----------------------------

 

As for blargh posts getting moved, I think Spunky's perhaps not taking blargh in the spirit it was meant.

 

Blargh, to me, is a game thread, like Word association or 'say something about the last poster' or werewolf, where the game IS the topic.

 

Now, in POlitics if the abortion thread gets sidetracked into a feminism debate, for instance, the mods will split that thread into two, where the discussion can continue in separate threads. That's not censorship to me.

 

(Crapshacking a post for being off-topic is censorship, to me, however.)

 

With Blargh we've come up with a system where direct replies are basically 'off-topic' so we split them off into the blargh-reply thread where the discussion can continue.

 

I therefore see no problem with moving posts from Blargh to blargh-reply if they violate the one rule of the game (not a rule of Hondo's, mind you, but a rule of the blargh game)

 

And once again, lemme apologize for getting on people's cases for infringements that never existed.

No, don't over analyze it... I'm just being a dick.

so here's the thing:

a random observation on blargh, even reflecting on a prior one, can be random. a direct quote/response to another one is not random. its the spirit of the thread. yeah, there's been consecutive replies, but its not as breaking as a reply is, its been understood since its inception.

 

having a single rule for a single thread (nevermind the underlying ones about context/spammers etc) doesnt fly in the face of the board's freedom, either: it actually preserves it. i know its a part-time campaign, pedro, but i feel i gotta keep moving shit over here cause you're doing doing it just to make me do so. besides, if its one of the only rules/traditions we have here, woudlnt it be more important to abide it?

 

this goes back to the notion that mebbe we should have an official rule list/laws. im working on just that, actually. stay tuned next week, you'll all see.

I'm trying to prove there are rules here already and always have been despite popular opinion, and that freedoms are conditional and restrictive, and I've done so already even if you may disagree. You all abide by unwritten rules enforced with peer pressure and admin privileges, and your freedoms are based upon ensuring you follow these unwritten rules. If you wanna argue that all successfully free places have rules and are still free, you're right, but for example, we follow facebook's written rules, facebook doesn't claim to be free but then imposes unwritten rules on you... hondo's does. Write them down, do it... Unveil your plans for organized freedom! Except you don't really need it...

keep the status quo, it's nicer, just don't claim it's something it isn't...

This...

/ \

I

I

I

I

 

AAAHHHRRG!!!

 

A travesty.

 

Blargh rules say no consecutive posts. Shame on you Spunkymonkey.

and this...

Goddammit!

 

More sacrilege.

 

No consecutive posts in Blargh! You're going to unravel the fabric of the universe if you and Spunky keep this up.

are direct responses to posts on here that have been moved to the finger reply thread, of course, not that I ever expected fair treatment, but I'd just like to point out how they violate the ONE RULE and are also not moved despite the fact that should be by your own friggin' recent determination to move my non-random posts. So, whoever's doing it is again, in violation...

not that any of you actually care... You'll just move this post over and keep them there, but that's ok, I'll keep pointing it out in perpetual eternity until someone does.

Control C.

Goddammit!

 

More sacrilege.

 

No consecutive posts in Blargh! You're going to unravel the fabric of the universe if you and Spunky keep this up.

You yourself are violating this by directly responding to our posts on here instead of finger wag... so your argument is invalid... FAIL. Regardless, the entire rule is invalid, the first post clearly states that is only ONE RULE (do not reply to other people's posts), one which I chose to break... rules concerning consecutive posts would make it TWO RULES... this entire thread is a complete failure of hondo's system of rules and order which, as stated on the knoll in 2006 prior to its undoing "rules do not exist and hence why hondo's is cooler".

Yes, nothing two faced at all about this 939 page thread at all.

It is April 29th in Northern Missouri, there are 5 inches of snow on the ground on top of the sheet of ice that came from the sleet and freezing rain that happened all morning. Global warming and all its supporters can suck my shrivled ice-cicle laden cock.

Today is March 29th.

Unless Northern Missouri is in some sort of time warp, then, you're right.

I think it's cause of the music, but I love this video, it's so cool.

A public safety announcement:

 

If you arent sure if she is underage, flip her over first.

 

bitch coulda lied.

/ \

I

I

I

I

 

AAAHHHRRG!!!

 

A travesty.

 

Blargh rules say no consecutive posts. Shame on you Spunkymonkey.

Hmm... you know what, fuck the rules, I'm going to start responding to shit right here... if you don't like it, move it yourself.

consecutive posts galore.

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/33538342.html

MY LITTLE PONY GOES HOLLYWOOD.

I got this as an advertisement on facebook?

DID YOU GET ARRESTED IN MIAMI? CLICK HERE FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF ALBERT A, HARPER, PA AND GET YOURSELF A FASHION BOUTIQUE LAW SPECIALIST! CLICK TODAY!

I don't think I need to explain myself, but I've been laughing for a good 10 minutes now. I can't stop.

 

I can't decide whether this is cool, or gay...

It's gay...

Must...resist urge...to directly reply to other people's Blargh posts...

So awesome....

Click quote, copy and paste, exit this thread go to one called "Finger Wag Reply Thread" and paste into a response there, then add your reply and click submit or whatever it's called.

Apparently, you get lynched if you respond to a post on here and not on finger wag, so you're better off just following the set rules and guidelines of hondo's which don't exist.

Sometimes, Bitch just don't get the message.

That's why you gotta buy his prosthetic legs one size larger... so he'll grow into them.

there is a field in sex? I thought it was always the pitcher and catcher... or even multiple pitchers and catchers. What else is there??

...really? you're asking...

straight sex must be boooooring as fuck.

Pancakes and Waffles are dessert items in most countries in the world, only in North America (US, Canada, some Caribbean nations) do we eat them as breakfast. My Enzedder friend laughed at the idea of eating pancakes for breakfast, though with US popular culture everywhere, it's probably caught on some.