the division of joy

No, this is more legit and constrictive than mario syndrome....

Its only when i try to go into a thread, it keeps downloading index.php rather than going into the thread...

^^ Do like This has been in my head for at least a month now... <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INgXzChwipY?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INgXzChwipY?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INgXzChwipY?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> (sorry about the double post..)

To have this place not hate Google Chrome.

Its not something I'd really want to watch twice, but it was very well made, especially so for what it is. That said, I'd rather watch it a million times over watching Antichrist. I wish I could scrub that entire film from my brain.

Heh, I came in here to post about what LL posted. I thought it was very good despite being awfully graphic.

Saw these a while back. They're gold. Absolute gold.

^^ Do like <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMAGwMAXTpU?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMAGwMAXTpU?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMAGwMAXTpU?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

Katy Perry, supposedly.

Fuck ya'll for skipping over this. Fuck ya'll in the face. <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Probably a more mainstream foreign film, but an amazing one nonetheless. I had sat on this film for as long as I can remember after Baytor suggested it way back when. One lazy day in work, after watching Unforgiven and Mystery Men, I figured I'd obligate my duty to this thread and review another film properly after my piss poor sleep deprived effort above. [rec] starts off with a slightly hyperactive tv presenter going over and fluffing her lines for a TV segment she is doing with the firemen in a local station. She seems fairly bored with interviewing most of the firemen for the most part and spends a lot of the time willing something to happen. When the alarm is raised, she goes on a ridealong to what seems like a fairly normal call for assistance in helping someone from a building, but not an actual fire. What occours from when inside the building is a tense, exciting and pants shittingly scary hour or so of film. The last ten minutes of this film are without doubt some of the creepiest I've seen in my adulthood. My only criticisms of the film would be the main female character and the point of view shooting. In my opinion she's very irritating and overacts, but I feel this is to give a sense of realism as I'd probably do similar in her position. The POV filming has spawned somewhat from the Blair Witch (which was awful) and lead on to this, which used it well, but irked at times, and Cloverfield and the remake of [rec], Quarantine. I'm not a fan of this as it gives me headaches, but that is just a personal caveat. All in all, I'd give this several opposing digits up.

http://www.entertonement.com/collections/14594/The-Ocarina-of-Rhyme

^^ Do like a lot ^^ <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

On the menu for today was... Probably the only bit of Swedish cinema I have on my hard drive. I'm still trying to get my head around it, but I think I liked it... There is the infamous playing chess with death scene in it. Its been ripped off a lot... Watch it. Its fucking strange.

If you listen to this and dislike it, you have absolutely no soul. Whatsoever. <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value=" name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

http://www.take180.com/ep/273hsr?autoplay=true

Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the “Categorical Imperative” (CI). Immorality thus involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. Other philosophers, such as Locke and Hobbes, had also argued that moral requirements are based on standards of rationality. However, these standards were either desire-based instrumental principles of rationality or based on sui generis rational intuitions. Kant agreed with many of his predecessors that an analysis of practical reason will reveal only the requirement that rational agents must conform to instrumental principles. Yet he argued that conformity to the CI (a non-instrumental principle) and hence to moral requirements themselves, can nevertheless be shown to be essential to rational agency. This argument was based on his striking doctrine that a rational will must be regarded as autonomous, or free in the sense of being the author of the law that binds it. The fundamental principle of morality — the CI — is none other than the law of an autonomous will. Thus, at the heart of Kant's moral philosophy is a conception of reason whose reach in practical affairs goes well beyond that of a Humean ‘slave’ to the passions. Moreover, it is the presence of this self-governing reason in each person that Kant thought offered decisive grounds for viewing each as possessed of equal worth and deserving of equal respect. which leads me to believe your gay.

http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/photos/10-really-cute-girl-celebs-are-still-virgins