Jump to content
Hondo's Bar

What was the last film you saw?


Recommended Posts

Double post is double.

 

Star Trek: Into Darkness

 

Does not stand up well on second viewing. Abrams is like the kid who instead of playing a board game by the rules, picks up the pieces and starts shouting "Pew pew! I totally just killed all your dudes HAHAHA"

Likewise with movies. Oh let's just forget about all that movie nonsense like storytelling, proper pacing or emotional resonance and just put in MORE LENS FLARE. Also instead of some character development... OH BIG SHIP EXPLOSION!

dontgetit.gif

Huh. I actually liked it more on the second viewing. I think I even posted in here about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It had entertaining scenes but otherwise it just seemed to blunder half-blinded from all the lens flare from one set-piece to another. I also hate to be such a whiney fanboy but if you're going to make a Star Trek film you don't just wipe your arse with the canon so thoroughly. The first one found a nice balance between Trekkie-pleasing and accessibility but the sequel was just a shameless vanity project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be fair, everything post-Deep Space Nine has been a shameless vanity project. And I forgive most of the canon issues not centered around Benedict Cumberbatch looking nothing like Ricardo Montalban on the grounds that the inherent nature of this new universe is that things aren't going to happen the way they have in the past. It lacked a lot of the quiet moments and I certainly would like to see the crew just not going from one disaster to the next, but it's still a long long way off from the bad movie. The movie's main and most unforgivable sin is in withholding information (and in some cases outright lying) and pretending that the reveal of how wrong it is is some sort of mind-bending twist. Still, it is entertaining for the most part and better than any of the other Star Trek movies (except the second).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. How is it all this shit has not been put in spoiler tags by Nick?

 

A: Because Nick don't cares nothing 'bout no Star Treks.

 

 

Let's be fair, everything post-Deep Space Nine has been a shameless vanity project...

pour vous

 

 

brandonbird_jen_sisko.jpg

 

Edited by Mr. Hakujin
thpoilerth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue here is not whizz bang and beautiful people. Most Star Trek fans prior to Abrams whoring up the franchise were contemplative introverted folk who enjoyed the moral and ethical themes. NOT lens flare and gratuitous phaser play.

It all comes down to what you liked about Trek to begin with. If you were in it for the space battles then Abrams films are for you. If like me and most Trekkies you were in it for the interesting ideas and exploration of concepts then they are not going to be your thing. Trek fandom aside I thought Into Darkness wasn't a very well written movie and that the pacing was terrible. The plot was lame and didn't make a whole lot of sense in anything claiming to be the ST universe.

 

Nick - First Contact was enjoyable. Generations and Insurrection weren't as bad as they're made out to be. Nemesis was truly awful. Skinny Tom Hardy was about the only good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...